Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2591-4775
Prothesenwechsel distales Femur
Prosthesis Exchange Distal FemurAuthors
Abstract
With the increasing number of primary knee prosthesis implantations and the demographic
changes, the number of periprosthetic fractures is also rising. Their treatment often
proves to be challenging.
Standard diagnostics consist of conventional X-rays with a calibration object. For
prosthesis planning, the adjacent joints should also be image, x-rays of the contralateral
side can be helpful. The imaging is usually supplemented by a CT scan to better assess
the prosthesis fit and bone quality. Based on the imaging, the fracture can be classified
according to Rorabeck or UCS, although the prosthesis fit cannot always be definitively
determined. The prosthesis model and implantation date should be identified, ideally
through the implant pass and surgical report.
In surgical treatment, osteosynthesis aiming to preserve the prosthesis should be
attempted, if technically feasible. Indications for a prosthesis exchange include
loose prosthesis, a well-fixed prosthesis with
poor or reduced bone quality that does not provide sufficient fixation for osteosynthesis,
fractures with a high risk of pseudarthrosis, ligamentally unstable prosthesis, or
periprosthetic fractures in geriatric patients, when an osteosynthesis doesn’t allow
primary full weight bearing. However, due to limited data, no general recommendation
or algorithm can be provided; decisions must be made on a case-by-case basis.
Until definitive treatment, temporary immobilization with an external fixator may
be necessary. Technically, a prosthesis exchange is a complex operation consisting
of four main steps: patient in dorsal decubitus and medial arthrotomy, resection of
the distal femur and preparation of the femoral canal, removal of the tibial component
and tibial preparation, followed by determination of the prosthetic components and
implantation.
The particular challenge lies in correctly restoring the joint line and especially
the femoral rotation.
The complication rates
and outcomes do not differ significantly from osteosynthesis according to several
current reviews and meta-analyses.
Die Zahl der Knieprothesenimplantationen steigt nicht nur in Deutschland kontinuierlich an. In der Folge nehmen auch die periprothetischen Frakturen zu. Hier ist zumeist das distale Femur betroffen, eine Osteosynthese mit Prothesenerhalt nicht immer möglich. Der folgende Artikel soll daher Indikation, operationstechnische Aspekte und zu erwartende Ergebnisse bei Wechseloperationen aufgrund distaler periprothetischer Femurfrakturen beleuchten.
Schlüsselwörter
periprothetische Femurfraktur - Knie-TEP - Prothesenwechsel - distaler Femurersatz - primäre VollbelastbarkeitKeywords
periprosthetic femoral fracture - knee arthroplasty - prosthesis exchange - distal femoral replacement - primary full weight bearingPublication History
Article published online:
02 October 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
Literatur
- 1 Förch S, Lisitano L, Mayr E. Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty for Fractures Around the Knee. Z Orthop Unfall 2023; 161: 619-627
- 2 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). EXHIBIT 3.3 Most Frequent All-listed Procedures by Sex. Accessed September 05, 2025 at: https://hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/factsandfigures/2008/exhibit3_3.jsp
- 3 Schwartz AM, Farley KX, Guild GN. et al. Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2030. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35: S79-S85
- 4 Chantelot C, Saab M, Martin T. et al. Revision total knee arthroplasty with periprosthetic distal femoral fracture. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2024; 110: 103856
- 5 Alden KJ, Duncan WH, Trousdale RT. et al. Intraoperative fracture during primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468: 90-95
- 6 Meek RMD, Norwood T, Smith R. et al. The risk of peri-prosthetic fracture after primary and revision total hip and knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93: 96-101
- 7 Singh JA, Jensen M, Lewallen D. Predictors of periprosthetic fracture after total knee replacement: an analysis of 21,723 cases. Acta Orthop 2013; 84: 170-177
- 8 Reed M, Brittain R, Howard P. et al. 3.3 Outcomes after Knee Replacement. In: National Joint Registry 18th Annual Report. 2021: 136-212 Accessed August 29, 2025 at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK576858/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK576858.pdf
- 9 Khan S, Schmidt AH. Distal Femoral Replacement for Periprosthetic Fractures around Total Knee Arthroplasty: When and How?. J Knee Surg 2019; 32: 388-391
- 10 Berend KR, Lombardi jr AV. Distal femoral replacement in nontumor cases with severe bone loss and instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467: 485-492
- 11 Mortazavi SM, Kurd MF, Bender B. et al. Distal femoral arthroplasty for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25: 775-780
- 12 Bundschuh KE, Grommersch BM, Tipton SC. et al. Distal Femoral Replacement versus Operative Fixation for Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty 2023; 38(7 Suppl. 2): S450-S458
- 13 Lützner J, Melsheimer O, Steinbrück A. et al. [High revision rates and mortality after treatment of periprosthetic distal femur fractures with a distal femur replacement : An analysis from the EPRD]. Orthopadie (Heidelb) 2024; 53: 136-143
- 14 Lex JR, Di Michele J, Sepehri A. et al. Distal femoral replacement or internal fixation for management of periprosthetic distal femur fractures: A systematic review. Knee 2022; 37: 121-131
- 15 Shields E, Behrend C, Bair J. et al. Mortality and Financial Burden of Periprosthetic Fractures of the Femur. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2014; 5: 147-153
- 16 Ponugoti N, Raghu A, Kosy JD. et al. A comparison of distal femoral replacement versus fixation in treating periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143: 3335-3345
